7 Explaining what the data mean
Results from the experiment
The control data and data in the presence of ACTZ are given in table 1.
Table 1 – calculation results
| Parameter | Control | ActZ |
| GFR (ml/min) | 120.5 | 115.9 |
| Total water reabsorbed ml/min | 108.0 | 96.9 |
| Fractional water reabsorption (%) | 89.6 | 83.6 |
| Amount of Na+ filtered (µmole/min) | 16749.5 | 15994.2 |
| Amount of Na+ excreted (µmole/min) | 172.5 | 556.7 |
| FENa+ (%) | 1.0 | 3.5 |
| Amount of HCO–3 filtered (µmole/min) | 3012.5 | 3013.4 |
| Amount of HCO–3 excreted (µmole/min) | 30.0 | 448.4 |
| FEHCO–3 (%) | 1.0 | 14.9 |
We can critically evaluate these data in the context of the impact of ACTZ, which we know is a carbonic anhydrase inhibitor. Obviously these data are a from single individual, and if we wanted to do an in depth analysis of the impact of ACTZ then we would have to repeat the experiment several times, building a dataset that can be analysed using statistics. As we only have an n of 1, then we can only look qualitatively at the results.
Key findings & explanations
GFR – is essentially unchanged, which is what we would expect.
Na+ – we can see that the amount of Na+ filtered is essentially unchanged, again as expected given the GFR and plasma Na+ are unchanged (139 versus 138 μmole/ml – see the data tables in the earlier chapters). However, the urinary of excretion of Na+ is increased ~3 fold with ACTZ. As the FENa+ is also increased this tells us that the reabsorption of Na+ by the nephron is reduced. Therefore ACTZ is inhibiting Na+ reabsorption.
HCO–3 – we can see that the amount of HCO–3 filtered is essentially unchanged, again as expected given the GFR and plasma HCO–3 are unchanged (25 versus 26 μmole/ml – see the data tables in the earlier chapters). However, the urinary of excretion of HCO–3 is increased ~15 fold with ACTZ. As the FEHCO–3 is also increased this tells us that the reabsorption of HCO–3 by the nephron is reduced. Therefore ACTZ is also inhibiting HCO–3 reabsorption.
Water – consistent with the impact on Na+ and HCO–3, urinary flow rate is increased with ACTZ, and the fractional reabsorption of water is reduced. Remember, water follows the Na+, so if less Na+ is reabsorbed then there will also be a reduction in water reabsorption.
These data are consistent with the effect of ACTZ on carbonic anhydrase. Figure 1 reminds you about the pathway for Na+ and HCO–3 handling by the proximal tubule.

Figure 1: a model of HCO–3 reabsorption in the renal proximal tubule. NHE3 = Na+ and H+ exchanger number 3.
ACTZ is inhibiting the carbonic anhydrase, which means that the conversion of carbonic acid to carbon dioxide and water is slowed. Therefore less HCO–3 is removed from the filtrate. In addition, there is an impact on NHE3 (Na+ and H+ exchanger number 3), meaning less Na+ is also reabsorbed, increasing excretion in the urine. The reduction in transport also reduces water reabsorption.